PACIFIC
ALBACORE
FISHERIES MANAGEMENT:
The Western Fishboat Owners Association has long believed that management of Highly Migratory Species (HMS) such as albacore should be coordinated on an international basis. The main reason for this is that these species have no national boundaries; to manage one nation's resources while others go un-managed would put an unfair burden on the managed nation's fishing community.
This section contains information on past, present, and future regulation and management of HMS. Tuna and tuna-like species are being managed at all levels of government. This includes international bodies such as the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) and the newly formed Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC). The WPCFC was formed from the Multilateral High Level Conference, which involved 28 nations beginning in 1996; agreement was reached in 2000. Since then organizational meetings have been held, and a full working commission is now in place in Pohnepei, FSM.
WFOA was a member of the U.S. State Department Delegation to the Multilateral High Level Conference (MHLC), and now sits on the delegation to the WCPFC. On the international level, WFOA also attends IATTC meetings. At the federal level we hold the troll representative chairman seat on the Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC) HMS advisory panel. The PFMC is now involved with HMS, especially albacore, that have come under the Fisheries Management Plan (FMP). WFOA also works with the Western Pacific Management Council (WPFMC) and other federal bodies and agencies that are responsible for managing the resource.
Western & Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC): In a nutshell, the WCP Convention will create a permanent Commission made up of one voting member from each participating nation (each party), as well as three separate advisory Committees (the Scientific, Compliance and Northern Pacific Committees). The Commission will design and implement comprehensive fisheries conservation, management, and enforcement systems for the high seas tuna fisheries, and also help to ensure adoption of compatible conservation programs within the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) that are under the jurisdiction of various Pacific island and coastal nations.
Depending on each fishery's status and characteristics, WCP conservation measures may include any combination of time/area closures, gear and technology restrictions, bycatch control regulations, total allowable catch limits, or fishing effort controls. Fishing vessels in the WCP Convention area will also be required to carry Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) satellite tracking units and participate in observer programs.
Meanwhile, participating nations will be required to share their harvest and other fisheries data, their high seas enforcement capabilities, and lists of all vessels flying their flag and fishing within the Convention area. Each nation will be required to cooperate with one another, administer any national catch and/or effort allocations to their fleets, and implement compatible conservation and management programs within their national waters (their EEZs). It would be fair to say that the WCP Convention is the most ambitious effort to prevent overfishing ever witnessed, and it will dramatically affect dozens of countries as well as thousands of fishermen.
For more information:
Comprehensive Management Body Site (NEW)
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC)
Western Pacific Fisheries Management Council (WPFMC)
National Marine Fisheries Service (SW Region and PIRO)
Southwest Fisheries Science Center
The Western Fishboat Owners Association (WFOA) position on Highly Migratory Species (HMS) management, as approved by the Board of Directors on April 9, 1999 is as follows:
| ABC | Acceptable biological catch | ||
| AFRF | American Fishermen's Research Foundation | ||
| BCTFA | British Columbia Tuna Fishermens Association | ||
| CDFG | California Department of Fish and Game | ||
| CFR | Code of Federal Regulations | ||
| CITIES | Convention in International Trade of Endangered Species | ||
| CPUE | Catch Per Unit of Effort | ||
| DFO | Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Canada) | ||
| DWFN | Distant Water Fishing Nation | ||
| EEZ | Exclusive Economic Zone | ||
| EFH | Essential Fish Habitat | ||
| EIS | Environmental Impact Statement | ||
| ESA | Endangered Species Act | ||
| ETP | Eastern Tropical Pacific | ||
| FAD | Fish Aggregating Device | ||
| FAO | U.N. Food and Agricultural Organization | ||
| FFA | Forum Fisheries Agency | ||
| FFC | Forum Fisheries Committee | ||
| FMP | Fisheries Management Plan | ||
| FSM | Federated States of Micronesia | ||
| HMS | Highly Migratory Species | ||
| HSFCA | High Seas Fisheries Compliance Act | ||
| ICCAT | International Convention for the Convention of Atlantic Tunas | ||
| IATTC | Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission | ||
| IFQ | Individual Fishing Quota | ||
| IMO | International Maritime Organization | ||
| ISC | Interim Scientific Committee (for North Pacific Tunas) | ||
| IVQ | Individual Vessel Quota | ||
| LE | Limited Entry | ||
| LOS | Law of the Sea Convention | ||
| MHLC | Multi Lateral High Level Conference | ||
| MPA | Marine Protected Area | ||
| MSC | Monitoring, Control and Surveillance | ||
| MSC | Marine Stewardship Council | ||
| MSY | Maximum Sustainable Yield | ||
| NEPA | National Environmental Policy Act | ||
| NGO | Non-Governmental Organization | ||
| NMFS | National Marine Fisheries Service | ||
| NOAA | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | ||
| NPFMC | North Pacific Fisheries Management Council | ||
| NRDC | Natural Resources Defense Council | ||
| NWHI | Northwest Hawaii Initiative | ||
| OA | Open Access | ||
| ODFW | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | ||
| OY | Optimum Yield | ||
| PIRO | Pacific Island Regional Office (NMFS) | ||
| PFMC | Pacific Fisheries Management Council | ||
| PIN | Pacific Island Nation | ||
| PNG | Papua New Guinea | ||
| PSMFC | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | ||
| RFA | Regulatory Flexibility Act | ||
| SAFE | Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation | ||
| SBA | Small Business Administration | ||
| SBREFA | Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act | ||
| SFA | US Magnuson-Stevens Sustainable Fisheries Act | ||
| SMI | Serious Marine Incident | ||
| SMNV | Standard Marine Communication Phrases | ||
| SPC | South Pacific Commission | ||
| SSC | Scientific and Statistical Committee | ||
| STAR | Stock Assessment Review | ||
| SWFSC | Southwest Fisheries Science Center | ||
| TAC | Total Allowable Catch | ||
| UNIA | UN Implementing Agreement (Straddling Stocks Agreement) | ||
| USCG | United States Coast Guard | ||
| USFWS | United States Fish and Wildlife Service | ||
| USTF | United States Tuna Foundation | ||
| UTC | United Tuna Cooperative | ||
| VMS | Vessel Monitoring System | ||
| WCP | Western Central Pacific | ||
| WCPFC | Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission | ||
| WDFW | Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife | ||
| WFOA | Western Fishboat Owners Association | ||
| WPFMC | Western Pacific Fisheries Management Council | ||
| WTA | Washington Trollers Association | ||
| WWF | World Wildlife Fund |
This section is a joint project of the Western Fishboat Owners Association and the American Fishermen's Research Foundation. It is designed to provide an introduction to fisheries management, along with comprehensive information about the Pacific albacore tuna fisheries and highly migratory species management efforts.
Basic Fisheries Management Techniques:
Excerpt from the National Research Council's 1999 "Sharing the Fish" report -- an overview of fisheries management tools used to regulate harvests.
Input Controls:
Input controls are the oldest type of fishery management tool. Designed to limit either the number of people fishing or the efficiency of fishing, input controls are the type of measure adopted when a fishery is first managed. Input controls include restrictions on gear, vessels, area fished, time fished, or numbers of people fishing. They apply to both commercial and sport fisheries, and may be applied to an entire fishery or to segments of it. Input controls are considered to be an indirect means of limiting the exploitation of fish stocks, because they do not directly control the amount of catch.
Licenses:
Licenses and license endorsements may be used to certify fishermen or vessels, without limitation on the numbers issued, or they may be used as a management measure to limit the number and types of vessels or fishermen that can participate in the fishery. License limitations are intended to limit fishing capacity and effort, but their effect on either is indirect. Limited licenses are are used both in federal fisheries -- such as the Hawaiian lobster and Pacific groundfish fisheries -- and in state fisheries such as the California sea urchin and Oregon pink shrimp fisheries. Licenses and endorsements can also be linked to vessel and gear requirements. In some fisheries, limited licenses are tradeable.
Controlling fleet capacity is only practical through license limitation. If licenses do not stipulate a maximum vessel size or other limits on fishing power or capacity, the capacity of the fleet can drift upward as small vessels are replaced with larger ones. The problem arises because size is only one dimension of fishing power. Also, attempts to control size can lead to adaptations that are inefficient or unseaworthy.
Output controls:
Output controls are management techniques that directly limit catch, and hence a significant component of fishing mortality (which also includes mortality from bycatch, ghost fishing, and habitat degradation due to fishing). Output controls can be used to set catch limits for an entire fleet or fishery, such as a total allowable catch. They can also be used to set catch limits for specific vessels (e.g. trip limits, individual vessel quotas), owners, or operators (individual fishing quotas), so that the sum of the catch limits for individuals or vessels equals the TAC for the entire fishery.
Output controls rely on the ability to monitor total catch. This can be achieved by either (1) measuring total landed catch with reliable landings records, port-sampling data, and some estimates of discarded or unreported catch; or (2) measuring the actual total catch with at-sea observer coverage or verifiable logbook data.
Total allowable catch:
TAC is a management measure that limits the total output from a fishery by setting the maximum weight or number of fish that can be harvested. TAC-based management requires that landings be monitored and that fishing operations stop when the TAC for the fishery is met. A TAC is based on stock assessments and other indicators of biological productivity, usually derived from both fishery-dependent (catch) and fishery independent (biological survey) data. Data collected from fishermen, processors, or dockside sampling can be combined with at-sea observations and independent fishery survey cruises to provide information about the total biomass, age distribution, and number of fish harvested.
Typically, the TAC is determined on an annual basis, and then partitioned across seasons.To the extent that a TAC is well estimated and enforced, it can control total fishing mortality on a stock (e.g. Pacific halibut).
Trip limits and bag limits:
These measures can pace landings by limiting the amount of harvest of a species in a given trip. Trip limits are applied in commercial fisheries when there is interest in spacing out the landings over time, or a desire to specify maximum landings sizes, and they are usually accompanied by a limit on the frequency of landings.
Quotas:
Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs) are a fishery management tool used in the Alaska halibut and sablefish, wreckfish, and surf clam / ocean quahog fisheries in the United States and other fisheries thoughout the world. These allocate a certain portion of the TAC to individual vessels, fishermen, or other eligible recipients based on initial qualifying criteria.
Individual vessel quotas (IVQs) are used in a number of fisheries worldwide, including some Canadian and Norwegian fisheries. IVQs are similar to IFQs, except that they divide the TAC among vessels registered in a fishery, rather than among individuals.
Highly migratory species (HMS) move great distances in the ocean to feed or reproduce, and they move through the high seas and the waters of several nations. Their presence depends on ocean temperature, availability of food, and other factors. Highly migratory species are sometimes called "pelagic," which means they do not live near the sea floor, or "oceanic," which means they live in the open sea. They are harvested by U.S. commercial and recreational fishers and by foreign fishing fleets. Only a small fraction of the total harvest is taken within U.S. waters.
The draft Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for HMS proposes to manage the following species:
Tunas: north Pacific albacore, yellowfin, bigeye, skipjack, and northern bluefin
Sharks: common thresher, pelagic thresher, bigeye thresher, shortfin mako, blue
Billfish/swordfish: striped marlin, Pacific swordfish
Other: dorado (also known as dolphinfish and mahi-mahi)
The Council monitors other species for informational purposes, and the FMP proposes to designate some species -- including great white sharks, megamouth sharks, basking sharks, Pacific halibut and Pacific salmon -- as prohibited. If fishers targeting highly migratory species catch these species, they must release them immediately.
Except for the swordfish drift gillnet fishery off California, the highly migratory species fisheries are among the few remaining open access fisheries on the West coast. However, some members of the fishing industry are concerned that problems in other fisheries (such as groundfish) will push more people into the HMS fishery, thus increasing fishing pressure.
Because of these concerns, the Council may consider developing a limited entry program to control excess capacity. The Council adopted a control date of March 9, 2000 in case a limited entry program is needed in the near future. This date was announced in the Federal Register as an advance notice to the public that a limited entry program may be adopted, and that any new entrants in the fishery after the control date may not qualify for a permit. The announcement applies to all commercial and charter fisheries for highly migratory species. Control dates are established to minimize the rush of new entrants in a fishery that often occurs when limited entry is being considered. It should be noted that the current draft FMP does not include a limited entry program at this time, but an amendment to the plan could be developed sometime in the near future to establish one.
For further information:
NOAA/NMFS OSF
PFMC
WFOA letter to the council June 2006 RE: Limited Entry
WPRFMC
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission
IATTC
The following is applicable to high seas fishing vessels and the albacore tuna fleet.
DISCLAIMER: Nothing herein should be construed as individual, technical, accounting, or legal advice. Readers are cautioned to seek individualized advice and assistance based on a detailed analysis of facts and situations. While every effort has been made to supply accurate and correct information, the Western Fishboat Association (WFOA) and its affiliate, the American Fishermen's Research Foundation (AFRF) have no responsibility for, nor in any way guarantee, the accuracy of the information contained herein unless the information originated with WFOA or AFRF. WFOA does not, by supplying links, in any way endorse or approve by that action the positions or philosophies of any of the linked agencies, associations, groups or documents.
International Law of the Sea
UN Straddling Stocks & Migratory Fish Agreement
International Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries
International High Seas Fishing Compliance Act
U.S. Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation & Management Act
U.S./Canadian Albacore Tuna Treaty
The Lacey Act
Note: NMFS special agents use this Act against foreign-flagged vessels that fish illegally in the EEZs of South Pacific island countries and import the fish into Guam and American Samoa. It is also used against U.S. fishermen who operate illegally in foreign waters, such as the Bahamas. Sections include: § 3371. Definitions; § 3372. Prohibited acts; § 3373. Penalties and sanctions; § 3374. Forfeiture; § 3375. Enforcement; § 3376. Administration; § 3377. Exceptions; § 3378. Miscellaneous provisions.
Fishermen's Protective Act
Note: Sections include: § 1971. "Vessel of the United States" defined; § 1972. Action by Secretary of State upon seizure of vessel by foreign country; preconditions; § 1973. Reimbursement of owner for any direct charges paid to secure release of vessel and crew; § 1974. Inapplicability of chapter to certain seizures; § 1975. Claims for amounts expended because of seizure; § 1976. Authorization of appropriations. § 1977. Reimbursement for seized commercial fishermen; § 1978. Restriction on importation of fishery or wildlife products from countries that violate international fishery or endangered or threatened species programs; § 1979. Fishermen's Protective Fund. § 1980. Compensation for loss or destruction of commercial fishing vessel or gear; § 1980a. Reimbursement of owner for fee paid to navigate foreign waters if fee inconsistent with international law; § 1980b. Sanctions for imposition of conditions on U.S. fishing vessel found inconsistent with international law.
South Pacific Tuna Fishing Act
Important! The albacore fishery is exempt from this Act, but it is included here since other tuna U.S. fisheries fall within its jurisdiction. This Act authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to issue and enforce regulations necessary to implement the Treaty on Fisheries Between the Governments of Certain Pacific Island States and the US.
Sections include: § 973. Definitions; § 973a. Application to other laws; § 973b. Regulations; § 973c. Prohibited acts; § 973d. Exceptions; § 973e. Criminal offenses; § 973f. Civil penalties; § 973g. Licenses; § 973h. Enforcement; § 973i. Findings by Secretary; § 973j. Reporting requirements; disclosure of information; § 973k. Closed Area stowage requirements; § 973l. Observers; § 973m. Technical assistance; § 973n. Arbitration; § 973o. Disposition of fees, penalties, forfeitures, and other moneys; § 973p. Additional agreements; § 973q. Secretary of State to act for United States; § 973r. Authorization of appropriations.
Also of interest:
Convention Establishing the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
| IATTC | Busan, South Korea | June 20-27, 2006 |
| PFMC & HMSAS | Foster City, CA | September 11 -14, 2006 |
| Northern Comm. WCPFC | Tokyo, Japan | September 11-13, 2006 |
| Tech/ Compliance Comm | Brisbane, Australia | September 28 - October 3, 2006 |
| WFOA Board Meeting | Seattle, WA | November 2006 (TBA) |
| PFMC & HMSAS | San Diego, CA | November 12-17, 2006 |
| WCPFC Commission | Apia, Western Samoa | December 11-15, 2006 |
| PHMC | Sacramento, CA | March 4-9, 2007 |
| WFOA Annual Meeting | Astoria, OR | March 27-30, 2007 |
| PFMC | WA or OR | April 1-6, 2007 |
Canadian Catch.pdf
2004 American Bar Association National Spring Conference on the Environment.pdf
INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION.pdf
INTERNATIONAL ALBACORE WORKING GROUP MEETING.pdf
INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT MEASURES.pdf
International - Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission.pdf
JUNE 2005 PFMC April Meeting.pdf
MAGNUSON ACT REAUTHORIZATION.pdf
MANAGEMENT by Peter Flournoy.pdf
Pacific Fishery Management Council’s HMS FMP.pdf
PrepCon VI Bali Indonesia and IATTC.pdf
WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC FISHERIES COMMISSION MEETING.pdf